Showing posts with label fake. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fake. Show all posts

Friday, August 26, 2016

Fake Magazine Covers

,
Here is a question for you…Have you ever wanted to be on the cover of Sports Illustrated? Or any magazine for that matter? Think of the fun you can have with your friends and family to have a magazine cover with your picture on it, printed and framed, hanging on your wall.

Well, I have found this site where you can get Fake Magazine Covers and it will not cost you a single cent. Check it out, this site has more than 100 magazine covers for you to have your picture placed on. Very simple to do, and no I am not going to put my picture on a cover!

All you have to do is go to the site, Fake Magazine Covers, and upload your picture. Simple to do as the uploader is right at the top right. Once you have uploaded your picture, find the magazine cover or magazine covers you want your picture on. Just easy to do and then print your cover for a nice memento and of course to frame.

Do go by this site soon and start having fun, it is as I said free. And do let your family, friends and coworkers know about this site. Heck, then you can all compare your magazine covers with one another and see who has the best, and the worst.

  • http://covervision.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Read more

Saturday, April 30, 2016

Computer generated fake papers are flooding academia

,

This story is all over the Internet, even making the Guardian newspaper. Im not entirely sure I agree with the statement that fake papers are "flooding" academia, but nonetheless it is worrying that bogus papers are being published by reputable publishers like Springer and the IEEE. However, in their defense these organisations/publishers do delegate the decisions on academic quality to individual conference chairs and programme committees. Its also not true that conferences with poor or negligible standards are just restricted to China. In 2004 I had two MSc students write and submit papers to a conference taking place in Wellington, New Zealand (KES2004). The students work was not very good and the papers they wrote were quite unexceptional and I fully expected that they would be duly rejected. I thought the rejection would be a good learning experience for the students and may encourage them to work harder in future; both were somewhat arrogant.
    I was very surprised, and slightly mortified, when both papers were accepted by the conference. My name was on these papers as co-author and knew them to be substandard. Nonetheless, I thought that attending the conference might be a good experience for the students. When they returned I was very surprised to see that the conference proceedings, published by Springer in their LNCS series, ran to two volumes of 600+ pages each. Nowhere in the proceedings introduction did it say how many papers were submitted for review and what percentage were accepted. This conference series, run by a respected UK academic, seemed like a vanity publishing project to me.

from The Universal Machine http://universal-machine.blogspot.com/

IFTTT

Put the internet to work for you.

via Personal Recipe 895909

Read more
 

Computer Info Copyright © 2016 -- Powered by Blogger